Wisconsin has become a battleground over the Obama administration’s plan to create a national system of high‐speed rail. Of the $8 billion in HSR grants awarded to the states in the stimulus bill, $810 million of it went toward a high‐speed route between Milwaukee and Madison.
Ironically, this Wisconsin “high‐speed” route would only achieve speeds of 79 mph initially and 110 mph by 2016. As a Cato essay on high‐speed rail points out, HSR aficionados don’t even consider 110 mph to be true high‐speed. In fact, passenger trains were being run at speeds of 110 mph or more back in the 1930s. And those “high‐speed” trains didn’t prevent the decline of passenger trains after World War II.
The Cato essay also notes that the 85‐mile line between Milwaukee and Madison “is only a tiny portion of the eventual planned route from Chicago to Minneapolis, and no one knows who will pay the billions necessary to complete that route.” In fact, to build a national system of true high‐speed rail on the 12,800 mile network envisioned by the administration, the cost could be close to $1 trillion.
Where would the money come from? State governments are hoping that it would be all from federal taxpayers. As I recently discussed, the states’ interest in grabbing new federal HSR money has dropped now that Congress is requiring a 20 percent state match:
Read the rest of this post →The states already have dedicated revenue sources for federal highway aid matching requirements (also 20 percent). With state tax revenues flat due to the recession, where would the money come from to pay for high‐speed rail projects? Proposing new taxes to fund high‐speed rail would probably be political suicide. And most state policymakers recognize that shifting money away from more popular programs to pay for high‐speed rail won’t be any more politically rewarding.
The issue is even affecting elections in states that are in line to receive federal funding for high‐speed rail. Scott Walker, a Republican candidate for governor in Wisconsin, recently said he’d send back the $810 million in stimulus funds the state has received for a rail line between Madison and Milwaukee. Walker appears to understand that his state has more pressing infrastructure needs and that high‐speed rail could become a fiscal black hole.