Search

99,112 results found

2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The Heller-ization of Originalism: Ramos v. Louisiana and the Problem of Frozen Context
By Nick Mosvick and Mitchell A. Mosvick
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The Dimming of Blaine’s Legacy
By Clint Bolick
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania
By Tanner J. Bean and Robin Fretwell Wilson
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The Disingenuous Demise and Death of Bivens
By Steve I. Vladeck
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

Liu v. SEC: Limiting Disgorgement, but by How Much?
By Jennifer J. Schulp
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The Removal Power: A Critical Guide
By Ilan Wurman
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

The DACA Case: Agencies’ “Square Corners” and Reliance Interests in Immigration Law
By Peter Margulies
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

“Still [Not] Crazy after All These Years”: Kahler v. Kansas and the Intersection of Criminal and Constitutional Law
By Paul J. Larkin, Jr.
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

All the President’s Papers
By Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court Review

2019-2020
Some long-percolating issues returned (executive power over immigration, Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate), and some new ground was forged on questions of presidential power and the administrative state. We saw a strange abortion ruling in which the chief justice did perhaps the most John Roberts thing ever and went against his own dissent from a four-year-old ruling because he felt bound by that precedent. And we saw a major ruling that extended Title VII protections against sex discrimination to cover sexual orientation and gender identity.
By Trevor Burrus
2019-2020
Supreme Court Review

Introduction
By Trevor Burrus
September 16, 2020
Blog

Disappointing Results from Taskforce on Telehealth
A key report falls short of identifying the needed action by Congress.
By Shirley Svorny
September 16, 2020
Books

Cato Supreme Court Review: 2019-2020
Now in its 19th year, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court’s most recent term, plus cases coming up.
By Trevor Burrus
September 16, 2020
The American Conservative

The West Shouldn’t Intervene In Belarus
Russia considers its neighbor a buffer between itself and NATO. The consequences of a provocation could be disastrous.
By Ted Galen Carpenter
September 16, 2020
Media Highlights TV

Simon Lester discusses the US dropping its tariffs on Canadian aluminum on CTV News
Featuring Simon Lester

Cato Annual Report

Featured Event

Saving Academia: A Conversation with Rep. Burgess Owens

Free Society

Spring 2025

The Heller-ization of Originalism: Ramos v. Louisiana and the Problem of Frozen Context

The Dimming of Blaine’s Legacy

The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania

The Disingenuous Demise and Death of Bivens

Liu v. SEC: Limiting Disgorgement, but by How Much?

The Removal Power: A Critical Guide

The DACA Case: Agencies’ “Square Corners” and Reliance Interests in Immigration Law

“Still [Not] Crazy after All These Years”: Kahler v. Kansas and the Intersection of Criminal and Constitutional Law

All the President’s Papers

2019-2020

Introduction

Disappointing Results from Taskforce on Telehealth

Cato Supreme Court Review: 2019-2020

The West Shouldn’t Intervene In Belarus

Simon Lester discusses the US dropping its tariffs on Canadian aluminum on CTV News