The NetChoice Cases and the Future of Online Speech
Watch the Event
Join the conversation on X using #Cato1A. Follow @CatoInstitute on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.
Featuring
Center for Growth and Opportunity Senior Research Fellow
President and CEO, NetChoice
Attorney
Stand Together Senior Fellow
Associate, Clement & Murphy PLLC
On February 26, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the cases of Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton. These cases are likely to have a significant impact on the future of free speech online and the way platforms engage in online content moderation.
With the oral arguments fresh in mind, this multipanel event will feature a fireside chat with Steve DelBianco, president and CEO of NetChoice, before moving on to panels of legal and policy experts who will analyze the Florida and Texas laws at issue in these cases and discuss what happened at oral arguments. The NetChoice cases represent a pivotal moment in the future of First Amendment jurisprudence both online and offline. As such, it is important that Cato provides a forum for understanding not only the Court’s consideration of these cases but also the broader impact such proposals should have. Further panels will discuss the impact the cases will have on the debates over Section 230 and online speech for users, as well as the impact on online content moderation decisions by online platforms.
Introduction and Welcome
Jennifer Huddleston, Technology Policy Research Fellow, Cato Institute
Fireside Chat
Steve DelBianco, President and CEO, NetChoice
Jennifer Huddleston, Technology Policy Research Fellow, Cato Institute
Panel 1: Reactions to the Supreme Court Arguments
Thomas A. Berry, Research Fellow, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute
Corbin Barthold, Internet Policy Counsel / Director of Appellate Litigation, TechFreedom
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Boochever and Bird Endowed Chair for the Study and Teaching of Freedom and Equality and Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Davis School of Law
James Xi, Associate, Clement & Murphy PLLC
Break
Panel 2: How the NetChoice Cases May Impact Content Moderation
David Inserra, Fellow for Free Expression and Technology, Cato Institute
Ashkhen Kazaryan, Stand Together Senior Fellow
Nathan Lindfors, Policy Director, Engine
Panel 3: What the NetChoice Cases Illustrate About the Current Online Speech Environment and Future of Online Speech for Internet Users
Jennifer Huddleston, Technology Policy Research Fellow, Cato Institute
Neil Chilson, Center for Growth and Opportunity Senior Research Fellow
Cathy Gellis, Attorney
Closing Remarks
Lunch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.