Skip to main content
Live Online Policy Forum

Murthy v. Missouri: Addressing Government Censorship by Proxy

Watch the Event
Murthy v. Missouri: Addressing Government Censorship by Proxy
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 1:30:20
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 1:30:20
 
1x
  • descriptions off, selected
  • captions off, selected
  • en (Main), selected

    Join the conversation on X using #Cato1A. Follow @CatoInstitute on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.

    Date and Time
    -
    Location
    Live Online
    Share This Event
    Featuring
    Jess Miers headshot
    Jess Miers

    Senior Counsel, Legal Advocacy, Chamber of Progress

    Kristin-A-Shapiro
    Kristin A. Shapiro

    Senior Fellow, Independent Women’s Forum

    On March 18, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Murthy v. Missouri. This case is likely to have a major impact on free expression online as the Court attempts to distinguish between lawful government engagement with social media companies as opposed to illegal government coercion or “jawboning.”

    Having just listened to the debate before the Court, this panel will examine the underlying issues of government censorship by proxy and what occurred during oral arguments. The panel will also discuss the impact this case could have on online speech and how the courts and policymakers can meaningfully address such censorship.