Skip to main content
Live Online Policy Forum

Biometrics: Privacy versus Public Safety

Watch the Event
Biometrics: Privacy versus Public Safety
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
  • Chapters
  • descriptions off, selected
  • captions off, selected

      Join the conversation on X using #CenturyofSurveillance. Follow @CatoInstitute on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.

      Date and Time
      -
      Location
      Live Online
      Share This Event
      Featuring
      Clare Garvie headshot
      Clare Garvie

      Fourth Amendment Center Training and Resource Counsel, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

      Nathan Wessler headshot
      Nathan Wessler

      Deputy Director, Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, American Civil Liberties Union

      Peter Pietra headshot
      Peter Pietra

      Privacy Officer, Transportation Security Administration

      The explosion in the use of facial recognition and other biometric technologies by government and private-sector entities has sparked a national debate about such systems. Just over a year ago, a Pew Research Center survey of American attitudes toward artificial intelligence also asked how people felt about law enforcement use of facial recognition. Among those surveyed, 46 percent thought the use of facial recognition by law enforcement is a good idea, even though two-thirds of respondents said police “would be able to track everyone’s location at all times and that police would monitor Black and Hispanic neighborhoods much more often than other neighborhoods.”

      How reliable is facial recognition? Can biases be unconsciously worked into the algorithms that make facial recognition possible? How many cases of mistaken identity have been attributed to facial recognition to date? How does the law at the federal, state, or local level impact the use of biometric technology? Is the technology advancing faster than the law and policy designed to govern its use? What is the state of the Transportation Security Administration’s facial recognition and biometrics programs for air travel? Can a person be forced to put their finger on their phone to open it for law enforcement officers absent a criminal predicate? Can private companies field facial recognition technology for the purpose of deciding who can or cannot buy a product or service, attend a concert, or even enter a building absent a safety concern? Our expert panel will tackle these and related questions.

      This event is part of the 2023 Cato Surveillance Week series:

      Session 1 • June 5, 2023

      The Pernicious Surveillance Legacy of 9/11

      Have officials in the executive branch and Congress learned anything from surveillance mistakes and overreaches?

      Session 2 • June 6, 2023

      Surveillance Reform Prospects

      What do we actually know about the alleged effectiveness of the controversial FISA Section 702 electronic mass surveillance program?

      Session 3 • June 7, 2023

      Domestic Terrorism versus Constitutional Speech

      Extreme political views and speech have been a feature of American political and social life virtually since the founding of the republic.

      Session 4 • June 8, 2023

      Biometrics: Privacy versus Public Safety

      The explosion in the use of facial recognition and other biometric technologies by government and private‐​sector entities has sparked a national debate about such systems.