Trump tried to ban TikTok and failed
This is also not the first time TikTok has faced threats of a national ban, as the Trump administration previously tried to undertake such actions via executive order.
Banning TikTok raises a set of concerns separate from those associated with banning certain equipment from telecommunications infrastructure. Unlike the bans on equipment, the banning of an app removes an opportunity for communication and expression for millions of Americans users.
TikTok bans dramatically expand the government’s ability to control what apps and technologies Americans can choose to use to communicate. Further, bans create consequences not just for the companies themselves, but also for users who violate the bans.
The ACLU, for example, has expressed concerns about the free speech and additional civil liberties implications of government bans by pointing out how it could set a dangerous precedent for the government interfering with what apps Americans may use to express themselves and communicate with others.
Some argue that national security concerns outweigh implications on speech, especially when users have a wide range of other social media platforms from which to choose. Even so, policymakers must walk a delicate line, as there could be further consequences of a TikTok ban.
For example, a ban is unlikely to affect only TikTok. It could also apply to any number of apps or technology services, making it more difficult on U.S. platforms and businesses abroad.
Increased scrutiny and the potential of a ban also could raise a tit for tat that leads other countries to ban U.S.-based apps and businesses, out of fear the U.S. government may have access to data they collect. It also might deter foreign companies from expanding in America, if they also do business in China, out of concerns they may get either caught in a tug of war or find themselves banned.
There is an ongoing review of whether TikTok U.S., through its Project Texas, has established the necessary safeguards to assuage concerns about the Chinese government ‘s ability to access U.S. users’ data.
The Trump administration’s attempt to ban TikTok was struck down by courts when the a U.S. district judge found insufficient evidence of national security risks, thus deeming the ban “arbitrary and capricious.”
One academic study found that TikTok does not censor U.S. content and does not have data collection practices that are more of a threat than other popular social media platforms. Before considering a radical step like a ban, policymakers must make sure any allegations of national security threats are firmly supported by evidence and not just vibes.