Litigation between OCTA and its prime contractor for the streetcar project, Walsh Construction Company, also raises questions about final costs and completion time. As the Register reported in March 2022, Walsh alleged that “OCTA didn’t provide finished or adequate plans and specifications for the project.”
The case continues with Walsh Construction filing a new motion earlier this month and a jury trial scheduled for next February. Meanwhile, Walsh Construction continues to work on the project despite its “quality issues, limited deployment of labor resources, and inaccurate schedule reporting” as alleged by OCTA staff.
Whenever the project finally goes into service, it is unlikely to carry the 7300 daily riders OCTA projected when seeking federal funding. As with most ambitious transit projects, the initial ridership estimate was likely optimistic, but, in any event, post-pandemic travel pattern changes will have an effect as well.
The OC Streetcar terminates in Santa Ana at the city’s Metrolink station, and commuters using Metrolink can be expected to supply a large proportion of the Streetcar’s riders. But, as with most systems, Metrolink suffered a steep ridership loss during COVID from which it has only partially recovered. Average weekday ridership on the regional system fell from 37,652 in the December quarter of 2018 to just 22,693 in the December quarter of 2023.
As a result, the OC Streetcar is likely to provide far more capacity than needed. Although each train can accommodate up to 211 passengers, a small fraction of this number can be expected to be on board at any given time.
Because trains will only run once every 10–15 minutes and the 4.15-mile line includes ten station stops, the streetcar may not save potential riders much time compared to walking, biking, or using an app-based rideshare vehicle.
While a streetcar was not the right solution for downtown Santa Ana and should be avoided by other mid-sized California cities, it is worth considering whether these cities can provide viable options to walking and driving.
Given more realistic ridership projections, it should have been clear that a bus line would have been adequate for the OC Streetcar’s route. Such a bus service could have included elements of “bus rapid transit” such as dedicated lanes, level boarding, and signal priority. As technology improves, it should be possible to safely run autonomous buses on such a route, creating the opportunity to provide very frequent service without excessive labor costs.
Another option is “micromobility” consisting of shared bikes, e‑bikes and e‑scooters. Users can rent these vehicles with a smartphone app or credit card at docking stations located around the city. While these vehicles can pose challenges on sidewalks and in traffic lanes, they’re a great fit for dedicated lanes that might otherwise be reserved for streetcars.
With the OC Streetcar nearing completion, there is no turning back. But cities and counties elsewhere in Southern California should learn the lessons of this costly, lengthy project and find more affordable mobility alternatives.