This decision weakened the regulatory process and ignored recipients’ human rights records given that the Commerce Department does not have access to the State Department’s list of arms dealers involved in suspicious or criminal activity.
Further, the Commerce Control List is less exhaustive than the State Department’s U.S. Munitions List. Since the change, the Commerce Department approved 30 percent more firearm export licenses than the State Department had the previous year.
Amongst the countries where the Commerce Department approved sales, Mexico received the sixth highest dollar value in firearm sales, totaling $30.3 million. Given that Congress was notified of just over $1 million in traditional military sales during the same period, this is a striking figure.
Worse still, the transition from the State Department to the Commerce Department has been disastrous for sales to other countries. Commerce has increased the number of countries with license exceptions from just Mexico, Canada, and the United Kingdom to 37 nations – though Mexico is not one of them – while also gutting end-use monitoring.
The Commerce Department estimates it will approve several hundred license applications under its license exceptions. This means that more countries can get weapons with less regulation and oversight.
Fortunately, there are broad policy changes that can reduce the risks associated with U.S. weapons sales. For instance, the government could either transfer regulation authority back to the State Department or be substantially more transparent.
Some positive changes have taken place in this regard. The Commerce Department announced in July 2022 that it would start requiring congressional approval to export certain licensed weaponry abroad. Unfortunately, because these weapons transfers still are being approved in a less regulated manner, the likelihood of them ending up in unsavory hands and being used in human rights violations is higher.
This was a point raised by congressional Democrats in late July of this year. They hope to undo the Trump-era authority that gave this power to the Commerce Department, which will allow concerns over human rights and weapons dispersion to be better evaluated.
Doing so will also reduce contracts to send weapons to Mexico, both reducing the number of weapons that need to be tracked and providing more protection against gang and cartel-associated individuals getting their hands on American-made weapons.
Senators Elizabeth Warren (D‑MA) and Chris Murphy (D‑CT) recently joined with representatives Joaquin Castro (D‑TX) and Norma Torres (D‑CA) to push the issue again. The group sent a letter to the Secretary of Commerce in late September expressing “grave concern about Commerce Department actions.”
The group expressed concern about “countries like Mexico, where corruption puts these weapons in the hands of criminals and identified violators of human rights.”
The Democrats in this case are right. In order to truly curb U.S. gun violence in Mexico, members of Congress must keep pushing these messages while introducing legislation in the National Defense Authorization Act that addresses these concerns.
Washington alone cannot stop gang and cartel violence in Mexico, but through necessary changes to current U.S. arms sale policy, Congress can greatly reduce the instances in which American weapons are at the center of such cases. Our politicians should not wait until the next innocent family is slaughtered to put these changes in place.