Let the Legislature Decide
by Ronald D. Rotunda
Ronald D. Rotunda is a fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of Treatise on Constitutional Law.
Added to cato.org on November 22, 2000
This essay originally appeared in USA Today on Nov. 21, 2000. Copyright 2000 Gannett Company Inc.
PRINT PAGE
E-MAIL PAGE
Not all disputes have to be resolved in court. In fact, both Florida and federal law provide a procedure for disputed presidential elections, and it doesn't involve the Florida Supreme Court.
Florida's non-judicial remedies include a prompt machine recount in races that remain tight after a first count. In this case, George W. Bush won them both. There is a hand count if there is machine malfunction, fraud or natural disaster. (There was none.)
Ronald D. Rotunda is a fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of Treatise on Constitutional Law.
More by Ronald D. RotundaGiven the need to move fast, Florida law sets a deadline, which passed last week. If the secretary of State does not certify the Florida electors in time, federal law provides that the Legislature should decide how electors should be appointed. Florida statutes, in turn, say that the legislature will choose the electors directly. This issue came up in 1876 in a Rhode Island case. The state Supreme Court held that the Legislature picks electors, and the court does not have a role.
But when the justices of the Florida Supreme Court (appointed by Democratic governors) enjoined the secretary of State from certifying the election, they provoked a constitutional crisis by ignoring precedent, overturning their trial court and ignoring Democrat Bob Crawford of the state canvassing board, who agrees with the secretary.
The court order last Friday is also unusual because normally a court waits until an aggrieved party files a motion. Not this court. It gave Al Gore something he never requested -- an injunction preventing the secretary from following her statutory duties.
Some people claim that selection of Florida's electors by the state Legislature would be partisan, but no more partisan than courts changing election law after the fact and granting court orders nobody asked for.
In fact, a fight in the Florida Legislature might be better than a court decision. First, that's what state and federal laws provide. Second, the debate there would be public, unlike the deliberations of the state court. This debate would also include Republicans, while all of the justices who sit on the Florida court are Democratic appointees.
The issue here is not respect for the role of courts, but respect for the law when it says solutions to thorny political problems must be found elsewhere.
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
NEW BOOKS
New Frontiers in Free Trade
"Razeen Sally's restatement of the case for unilateral liberalization is powerful and could not be timelier. His reflections on the prospects for trade policy are lucid and entirely persuasive. This short book is the best and most important volume on trade in years."
––CLIVE CROOK, Columnist, Financial Times
The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism
A compilation of and introduction to libertarian scholarship, this comprehensive book includes more than 300 succinct, original articles on libertarian ideas, institutions, and thinkers.
Global Tax Revolution
In the increasingly integrated global economy, nations are waging a battle between governments to attract investment and skilled workers by overhauling their tax codes to create a more attractive business environment. The authors challenge the U.S. government to lead the tax competition battle in the international marketplace.
SUBSCRIPTIONS
From audio recordings of the best of Cato's events to articles by world-class experts, CatoAudio, Regulation and Cato Journal offer an amazing range of quality news and analysis.
CATO STORE
For Cato books and periodicals, hats and cups, specially created merchandise, and Cato-branded Lands' End clothing – the Cato Store is open 24/7.