October 28, 1999
Policy Analysis no. 358
Executive Orders and National Emergencies: How Presidents Have Come to "Run the Country" by Usurping Legislative Power
by William J. Olson and Alan Woll
William J. Olson heads a McLean, Virginia, law firm that focuses on constitutional, administrative, and civil litigation. Alan Woll is an attorney in Blevins, Arkansas.
Published on October 28, 1999
PRINT PAGE
E-MAIL PAGE
During the recent presidential scandals, concluding with the impeachment of President Clinton, many people were heard to say that the investigations should end so that the president could get back to "the business of running the country." Under a constitution dedicated to individual liberty and limited government--which divides, separates, and limits power--how did we get to a point where so many Americans think of government as embodied in the president and then liken him to a man running a business?
William J. Olson heads a McLean, Virginia, law firm that focuses on constitutional, administrative, and civil litigation. Alan Woll is an attorney in Blevins, Arkansas.
The answer rests in part with the growth of presidential rule through executive orders and national emergencies. Unfortunately, the Constitution defines presidential powers very generally; and nowhere does it define, much less limit, the power of a president to rule by executive order--except by reference to that general language and the larger structure and function of the Constitution. The issue is especially acute when presidents use executive orders to legislate, for then they usurp the powers of Congress or the states, raising fundamental concerns about the separation and division of powers.
The problem of presidential usurpation of legislative power has been with us from the beginning, but it has grown exponentially with the expansion of government in the 20th century. In enacting program after program, Congress has delegated more and more power to the executive branch. Thus, Congress has not only failed to check but has actually abetted the expansion of presidential power. And the courts have been all but absent in restraining presidential lawmaking.
Nevertheless, the courts have acted in two cases--in 1952 and 1996--laying down the principles of the matter; the nation's governors have just forced President Clinton to rewrite a federalism executive order; and now there are two proposals in Congress that seek to limit presidential lawmaking. Those developments offer hope that constitutional limits--and the separation and division of powers, in particular--may eventually be restored.
Full Text of Policy Analysis no. 358
(PDF, 258 KB | HTML)
© 2008 The Cato Institute
Please send comments to webmaster
NEW BOOKS
Smart Power
Foreign policy expert Ted Galen Carpenter outlines strategies for protecting America’s security while avoiding unnecessary and unrewarding military adventures.
The Cult of the Presidency
“Rhetorical—and related—excesses are inherent in the modern presidency. This is so for reasons brilliantly explored in the year’s most pertinent and sobering public affairs book, The Cult of the Presidency: America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power.”
––GEORGE F. WILL
The Dirty Dozen
This unprecedented analysis of cases that changed the course of American history reveals the ongoing impact these cases have on free speech, economic liberty, property rights, private contracts, and much more.
SUBSCRIPTIONS
From audio recordings of the best of Cato's events to articles by world-class experts, CatoAudio, Regulation and Cato Journal offer an amazing range of quality news and analysis.
CATO STORE
For Cato books and periodicals, hats and cups, specially created merchandise, and Cato-branded Lands' End clothing – the Cato Store is open 24/7.